Off-page SEO services, or what the rest of the internet says about you

Google decides how much to trust your site partly from what other websites do. Links, mentions, reviews, and listings. It's the slowest part of SEO and the hardest to fake safely.

Nothing bought, nothing spammed Every link shown to you with its source Honest about how slow this is

Four things happening away from your site

Off-page gets talked about as though it only means links. Links matter most, but they aren't the whole picture.

Biggest factor

Links from other sites

When another website links to yours, it's treated a bit like a recommendation. Who is doing the linking matters far more than how many.

Underrated

Mentions without a link

Being talked about by name, even where nobody linked. It helps Google understand that your business exists and what it's known for.

Local and trust

Reviews

Google reviews and reviews on the platforms people use in your industry. They affect local visibility directly and affect whether people click.

Foundations

Listings and profiles

Your business details on directories and industry bodies. Low impact individually, and worth having consistent rather than scattered and contradictory.

Two links. One of them is worth having.

Both would appear in a report as "1 backlink acquired". This is why link counts tell you almost nothing on their own.

Worth nothing, possibly worth less than nothing

  • A site that exists only to publish links
  • Nothing to do with the topic of the article
  • Nobody reads it, so nobody clicks the link
  • Sitting next to links to unrelated industries
  • The kind of pattern Google is specifically looking for

Worth having, and worth the effort it took

  • A site your customers might actually read
  • The link sits inside relevant content
  • People clicking it are potential customers
  • It would exist even if search engines didn't
  • Hard to get, which is exactly why it counts

The simplest test: would this link still be worth having if Google shut down tomorrow? If the answer is yes, it's a real link. If it only makes sense as an attempt to influence rankings, it's the kind that eventually costs you. Where link work is the main thing you need, that's covered in more detail under link building.

How links actually get earned

None of this is quick, and there's no method that produces good links at volume. Anyone claiming otherwise is buying them.

Having something worth linking to

Original data, a genuinely useful tool, or the clearest explanation of something in your industry. It's slow, and it's the only method that keeps working on its own.

Reclaiming mentions

You get named in articles without a link more often than you'd think. Finding those and asking is the easiest win available, because the relationship already exists.

Press and journalist requests

Journalists need expert comment on deadline. Responding usefully and quickly gets you coverage on sites you could never approach cold.

The relationships you already have

Suppliers, partners, trade bodies, sponsorships, and clients. Most businesses have a dozen legitimate links available and have never asked for one.

Industry and local listings

The directories and associations that matter in your sector. Not mass directory submissions, which stopped working a very long time ago.

Writing for the right places

A genuine article on a publication your customers read. Worth doing rarely and properly, not as a monthly quota of guest posts nobody reads.

What we won't do, and why

All of these are still sold, and they all work for a while. The problem is what happens afterwards, and cleaning it up costs more than the links did.

Buying links

Against Google's rules, and the sites selling them are selling to everyone else too. The footprint is easy to spot.

Private link networks

Groups of sites built purely to link to clients. When one gets found, everything connected to it is exposed.

Bulk directory submissions

Five hundred listings on directories nobody visits. Sold cheaply because it's automated, and it does nothing.

Comment and forum spam

Links dropped into comment sections and unrelated threads. Ignored by search engines and embarrassing if a customer sees it.

Guest posts by the hundred

Articles written for sites that accept anything, on topics nobody chose. A different shape of the same problem.

Fake reviews

Removable, damaging to trust when spotted, and in several countries a legal problem rather than just a ranking one.

If your site already has links like these from a previous agency, that's fixable and it's worth looking at before building anything new. Sometimes the fastest improvement available is removing what's dragging a site down rather than adding more to it.

What to expect, honestly

This is the part of SEO where expectations most often don't match reality, so it's worth setting out plainly.

It's slow

Months rather than weeks, and the effect builds gradually rather than arriving. If you need movement this quarter, on-page work and paid search are the honest answers.

The numbers are small

A handful of good links in a month is a good month. Any agency reporting fifty a month is counting things that aren't worth counting.

You'll see every one

Each link reported with the page it's on and how it happened. If we can't explain how a link was earned, it shouldn't be in the report.

Common questions

Link building is one part of off-page SEO, and the biggest part. Off-page also covers mentions, reviews, and your listings across the web.

If links are specifically what you need, link building covers that in more detail. If you're not sure which, that's a conversation rather than a page.

There's no target number. What matters is how you compare to the sites currently ranking above you for the terms you care about, and that varies enormously by market.

In some industries a dozen good links puts you in contention. In others the sites at the top have thousands and the honest answer is that links aren't your fastest route.

No. Links at that volume and price are bought or automated, because earning a hundred real links a month isn't possible at any price a small business would pay.

It can produce a temporary lift, which is what makes it tempting. What follows is either a slow decline or a sudden drop, and the cleanup costs more than the links did.

Sometimes. Google ignores most low quality links rather than punishing them, so many old link problems are simply doing nothing rather than actively harming.

Where there's a real problem, it usually shows as a drop that lines up with a specific date. That's worth investigating properly before assuming links are the cause.

Depends on your competition. In a lot of local and specialist markets, a well built site with good content wins without much link work at all.

In competitive markets it becomes the deciding factor, because everyone at the top has already done the on-page and technical work. We'd look at who you're up against before recommending it.

More than with other SEO work, yes. The best links come from things only you have: your data, your expertise, your relationships, and your willingness to comment on your industry.

Realistically that's an hour or two a month from someone who knows the business. Off-page work without any client involvement is exactly the kind that ends up bought.

Off-page SEO is part of our SEO service

It normally comes after the site itself is in order, because links pointing at a weak site don't achieve much. Pricing sits on the main SEO page.

SEO services

Other SEO services

Find out whether links are actually your problem

Thirty minutes comparing you against whoever is ranking above you, and an honest answer either way.

Or email hello@culmen.digital
Book a free strategy call